Table 5.

Comparison of mean lumen diameter between computational stenting versus optical coherence tomography in clinical cases by Bland–Altman analysis.

Mean lumen diameter
Training group	Bias (mm)	95% limits of agreement (mm)
Patient #1	0.10	− 0.27 to 0.47
Patient #2	0.05	− 0.12 to 0.23
Patient #3	0.07	− 0.34 to 0.48
Patient #4	0.03	− 0.22 to 0.28
Patient #5	0.20	0.05 to 0.34
Overall bias	0.08	− 0.24 to 0.41
Testing group
Patient #6	0.13	− 0.19 to 0.44
Patient #7	0.11	− 0.21 to 0.42
Patient #8	0.03	− 0.25 to 0.30
Patient #9	0.18	− 0.30 to 0.66
Patient #10	0.01	− 0.31 to 0.33
Overall bias	0.08	− 0.29 to 0.46