Table 6.

Comparison of mean stent diameter between computational stenting versus optical coherence tomography in clinical cases by Bland–Altman analysis.

Mean stent diameter
Training group	Bias (mm)	95% limits of agreement (mm)
Patient #1	0.14	− 0.26 to 0.55
Patient #2	0.11	− 0.16 to 0.38
Patient #3	0.13	− 0.25 to 0.52
Patient #4	0.09	− 0.25 to 0.44
Patient #5	0.19	− 0.0004 to 0.39
Overall bias	0.13	− 0.21 to 0.48
Testing group
Patient #6	0.19	− 0.11 to 0.48
Patient #7	0.16	− 0.14 to 0.46
Patient #8	0.03	− 0.37 to 0.43
Patient #9	0.23	− 0.28 to 0.74
Patient #10	0.09	− 0.25 to 0.43
Overall bias	0.14	− 0.25 to 0.54