Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;22:42. doi: 10.1186/s12860-021-00380-8

Table 1.

Comparison of semen and sperm parameters between the healthy fertile men, bacteriospermic and non-bacteriospermic subfertile men

Parameters Healthy Fertile men Non-Bacteriospermic subfertile men Bacteriospermic subfertile men
No. 35 112 60
Age (year) 36.14 ± 18.14 34.24 ± 21.12 35.70 ± 10.83
Volume (mL) 4.05 ± 0.87 4.19 ± 0.90 3.91 ± 1.49
Sperm concentration (106/mL) 75.36 ± 34.12 33.04 ± 11.60 * 24.84 ± 15.93 *
Motility (%) 67.23 ± 20.65 31.71 ± 11.09 * 24.04 ± 11.82 ** #
Progressive motility (%) 39.33 ± 8.06 16.50 ± 7.85 * 11.30 ± 6.80 ** #
Leukocytospermia (106/mL) 1.80 ± 1.90 4.12 ± 3.80 * 5.42 ± 5.49 ** #
DNA Fragmentation (%) 14.33 ± 10.97 23.50 ± 12.81 42.21 ± 19.31 * #
Viability (%) 85.03 ± 13.17 67.67 ± 16.62 55.91 ± 13.56 * #
Normal morphology (%) 6.03 ± 1.05 2.83 ± 1.32 * 1.75 ± 1.13** #

All data are represented as mean ± SEM

* The following values were compared: subfertile men vs healthy fertile men, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

# Non-Bacteriospermic subfertile men vs Bacteriospermic subfertile men, #p < 0.05