Table 3.
Adverse Events | RBZ + Laser (n = 77) | BVZ + Laser (n = 51) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Arterial thromboembolic events | 0 | 0 | - |
Angina pectoris | 1 (1.29%) | 1 (1.90%) | |
Pulmonary embolism | 0 | 0 | |
Cerebrovascular accident | 0 | 0 | |
Myocardial infarction | 0 | 0 | |
Hypertension | 2 (2.59%) | 1 (1.90%) | |
Non-ocular hemorrhage | 0 | 0 | |
Vitreous hemorrhage | 0 | 1 (1.90) | |
Retinal detachment | 0 | 0 | |
Endophthalmitis | 0 | 0 | |
Raised IOP | 0 | 1 (1.90) | |
Ocular pain | 3 (3.89%) | 3 (5.88%) | |
Total number of subjects with different kinds of adverse event | 6 (7.79%) | 7 (13.72%) | 0.276 |
Number of subjects with no adverse events | 71 (92.20%) | 44 (86.27%) |
Notes: Categorical variables in two groups were presented as percentages (%) and compared by the Chi-Square test. In the RBZ + Laser treated group 7.79% of subjects (1.29% angina pectoris, 2.59% hypertension, and 3.89% ocular pain) were found to be associated with different types of adverse events. In the BVZ + Laser treated group, 13.72% of subjects (1.90% angina pectoris, 1.90% hypertension, 1.90% vitreous hemorrhage, IOP raised among 1.90% and 5.88% subject experienced ocular pain) were found to be associated with different types of the adverse event. The rest 92% in RBZ + Laser treated group and 86.27% subjects in BVZ + Laser treated group experienced no adverse events. Subjects with adverse events and subjects without adverse events showed no significant distributional difference (p = 0.276) between the groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Abbreviation: IOP, intraocular pressure.