Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;15:3341–3350. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S317771

Table 5.

Distribution of Subjects with and without Clinically Significant Diabetic Macular Edema (CSDME) After 12 Months of Different Treatment Groups

Presence or Absence of CSDME RBZ+Laser Treated Group BVZ+Laser Treated Group p-value
Presence 28 (36.36%) 22 (43.13%) 0.464
Absence 49 (63.63%) 29 (56.86%)

Notes: Categorical variables in two groups were presented as percentages (%) and compared by the Chi-Square test. In the RBZ + Laser treated group 28 (36.36%) and 49 (63.63%) subjects were found with CSME and without CSDME respectively after 12 months. In the BVZ+Laser treated group 22 (43.13%) and 29 (56.86%) subjects were found with CSDME and without CSDME respectively after 12 months. The statistical analysis showed no statistical difference in subjects distribution between the groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.