Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Aug;5(8):e526–e533. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00172-8

Figure 1. Mean differences in nutrient content between estimated adjusted post-policy purchases and estimated adjusted counterfactual post-policy total food and beverage purchases,1 overall and by high-in status2.

Figure 1.

1 Estimates derived from fixed effects models comparing post-policy nutrient content of purchases to counterfactual post-policy nutrient content of purchases based on pre-policy trends. Purchase data provided by Kantar WorldPanel Chile.

2 High-in status: High-in foods and beverages were those subject to the marketing, labeling, and school foods policies of the Chilean Law of Food Labeling and Advertising due containing added sugars, saturated fats, or salt and exceeding nutrient or energy thresholds; not high-in foods and beverages did not exceed nutrient thresholds and were not subject to the policies; overall estimates include High-in and Not high-in product purchases.

* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, *** p<0.0001 for the difference between post-policy nutrient content of purchases compared to the counterfactual post-policy nutrient content of purchases