Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;13:675583. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.675583

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants.

All (n = 40) HC (n = 10) SCD (n = 30)
Demographics
Females [n] (%) 18 (45.0) 3 (30.0) 15 (50.0)
Age [years] 68 (6), 60–83 72 (8), 63–83 67 (4), 60–76
Education [years] 16 (3), 11–23 15 (2), 11–19 17 (3), 11–23
Cognition and mental health
MMSE [score] 29.2 (0.8), 27.0–30.0 29.2 (1.0), 27.0–30.0 29.2 (0.7), 28.0–30.0
ECog-39 [score] 1.6 (0.4), 1.1–2.7 1.2 (0.1), 1.1–1.4 1.7 (0.4), 1.1–2.7
GDS [score] 1.5 (1.2), 0–4.0 0.6 (0.7), 0–2.0 1.7 (1.1), 0–4
PSWQ [score] 38.7 (11.1), 16.0–59.0 31.3 (7.7), 19.0–46.0 41.1 (11.0), 16.0–59.0
Genetics
APOE ε4 carrier [n] (%) 10 (25.0) 0 (0) 10 (33.3)
FBB PET
Amyloid positive [n] (%) 8 (20.0) 1 (10.0) 7 (23.3)
cSUVR 1.1 (0.2), 0.9–1.9 1.1 (0.2), 1.0–1.5 1.1 (0.2), 0.9–1.9

The data are given, if applicable, as mean (SD or %) and range for all participants as well as for each group (HC and SCD) separately. The amyloid positive rating was based on the visual assessment of FBB PET images. APOE ε4, apolipoprotein E ε4; cSUVR, composite standard uptake value ratio; ECog-39, 39-item Everyday Cognition Scales; FBB PET, 18F-florbetaben PET; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; HC, healthy controls; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PSWQ, Penn State Worry Questionnaire; SCD, subjective cognitive decline; SD, standard deviation.