TABLE 5.

The indirect effects.

Hypotheses	Relationship	Path coefficient	T statistics	P-values	Decision
H8a	DJ - > POS - > LMX - > RFC	0.030	3.035	0.003	Supported
H8b	PJ - > POS - > LMX - > RFC	0.038	3.155	0.002	Supported
H8c	IJ - > POS - > LMX - > RFC	0.023	2.316	0.021	Supported
H8d	DJ - > POS - > LMX - > RTC	−0.023	2.464	0.014	Supported
H8e	PJ - > POS - > LMX - > RTC	−0.029	2.585	0.010	Supported
H8f	IJ - > POS - > LMX - > RTC	−0.018	2.054	0.040	Supported
H9a	DJ - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.013	1.859	0.064	Not Supported
H9b	PJ - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.012	1.859	0.064	Not Supported
H9c	IJ - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.011	1.949	0.052	Supported
H9d	DJ - > POS - > RFC - > RTC	−0.023	2.272	0.024	Supported
H9e	PJ - > POS - > RFC - > RTC	−0.030	2.581	0.010	Supported
H9f	IJ - > POS - > RFC - > RTC	−0.018	2.026	0.043	Supported
H10	POS - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.030	2.328	0.020	Supported
H11a	DJ - > POS - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.007	2.045	0.041	Supported
H11b	PJ - > POS - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.009	2.145	0.032	Supported
H11c	IJ - > POS - > LMX - > RFC - > RTC	−0.006	1.789	0.074	Not Supported