Table 1.
Characteristics of the Included Studies
| Author | Study type, LoE | Coleman | N | Outcomes | Included in previous review?5 | Minimum FU (yr) | Mean age | Rate of patients with concurrent cuff repair (%) | Rate of patients with cointerventions (%) | Tenodesis type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belay et al. | Randomized controlled triaI, I | 66 | 34 | VAS, ASES, SANE | No | 2 | 56 | 56 | 56 | Suprapectoral |
| Castricini et al. | Randomized controlled trail, I | 91 | 55 | Constant score, popeye deformity VAS, SF 36, ROM, elbow flexion strength, cramping pain | No | 2 | 58 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Hufeland et al. | Randomized controlled triaI, I | 78 | 20 | Constant score, flexion strength, and Popeye deformity | No | 1 | 52 | 0 | 0 | Suprapectoral |
| Lee et al. | Randomized controlled trial, I | 94 | 128 | ROM, VAS, ASES, Constant score, Popeye deformity | No | 1 | 63 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| MacDonald et al. | Randomized controlled triaI, I | 78 | 114 | ASES, WORC, VAS, elbow flexion and supination strength (no comparison with contralateral side), Popeye | No | 2 | 57 | 65 | 100 | Subpectoral |
| Oh et al. | Randomized controlled trial, I | 86 | 86 | ASES, VAS, flexion strength, supination strength, Popeye deformity, cramping pain and bicipital pain | No | 1 | 59 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Van Deurzen et al. | Randomized controlled triaI, I | 78 | 100 | Constant sore, ESI, DASH, DOSS, EQ5D, VAS, external rotation, Popeye deformity | No | 1 | 61 | 100 | 100 | Intracuff |
| Zhang et al. | Randomized controlled trail, I | 97 | 151 | Surgical time, cost, pain (VAS), Popeye sign, flexion and supination strength and Constant score | yes | 2 | 61 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Aflatooni et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 66 | 215 | Satisfaction, cramping pain, and bicipital pain | No | 1.8 | 61 | 55 | 65 | Suprapectoral |
| Biz et al. | Prospective cohort study, II | 33 | 252 | Modified UCLA, VAS, SST, Popeye deformity, bicipital and cramping pain | No | 1 | 57 | 100 | 100 | Intracuff |
| Boileau et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 85 | 72 | Constant score, ROM, biceps related pain, radiologic changes, muscle cramps, Popeye deformity | yes | 2 | 70 | 0 | 0 | Suprapectoral |
| Cho et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 76 | 83 | Constant score, UCLA score and Popeye deformity, function, strength and acromiohumeral distance | yes | 1.3 | 61 | 100 | 100 | Intracuff |
| De Carli et al. | Prospective cohort study, II | 66 | 65 | Strength, Constant score, Popeye deformity | yes | 1.6 | 58 | 100 | 100 | Intracuff |
| Delle Rose et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 71 | 104 | Constant score, VAS and DASH and cramping pain, Popeye deformity | yes | 2.4 | 48 | 0 | 0 | Intracuff |
| Fang et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 58 | 154 | VAS, Constant score, ASES, DASH | No | 1 | 63 | 100 | 100 | Subpectoral |
| Friedman et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 64 | 42 | Popeye deformity, strength, ROM, VAS, DASH, ASES, cramping pain, and bicipital pain | No | 1.6 | 49 | 62 | 91 | Subpectoral |
| Godenèche et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 71 | 134 | Constant score, SST and SSV | No | 10 | 56 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Ikemoto et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 57 | 77 | UCLA, ROM and elbow flexion strength, Popeye deformity | No | 2 | 58 | 100 | 100 | Intracuff |
| Kerschbaum et al. | Prospective cohort study, II | 55 | 57 | Constant score, LHB score, Popeye deformity, bicipital and cramping pain | No | 2 | 61 | 39 | 79 | Suprapectoral |
| Koh et al. | Prospective cohort study, II | 75 | 84 | Popeye deformity, strength, Constant score, ASES | yes | 2 | 65 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Mardani et al. | Prospective Cohort study, II | 53 | 44 | Constant score, NRS, SST, cramping pain and Popeye deformity | No | 2 | 55 | 100 | 100 | Subpectoral |
| Meraner et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 51 | 53 | Constant score, flexion strength, cramping pain, and bicipital pain | No | 2.2 | 58 | 100 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Sentürk et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 45 | 20 | Strength, Constant and UCLA scores, Popeye deformity | yes | 1 | 60 | 90 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Shank et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 58 | 67 | Elbow flexion strength | yes | 0.7 | 51 | 9 | 100 | Suprapectoral |
| Wittstein et al. | Retrospective cohort study, III | 72 | 35 | Strength, SANE and MASES score, Popeye deformity | yes | 2 | 57 | 51 | 51 | Suprapectoral |
ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Score; Coleman, Coleman Score; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; LHB, long head of the biceps brachii; LoE, level of evidence; MASES, Mid-Atlantic Shoulder & Elbow Society; NRS, numerical rating scale; ROM, range of motion; SANE, single assessment numeric evaluation; SST, simple shoulder score; SSV, subjective shoulder value; UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles score; VAS, Visual Analogue Score; WORC, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index questionnaire.