Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;33(2):112–117. doi: 10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_61_20

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression models for fusional vergence amplitudes, monocular and binocular accommodative facility in the presence of age and sex

Coefficient (P)

Sex Age (year)
Distance NFV break (PD) 0.395 (0.059) −0.011 (0.190)
Distance PFV blur (PD) 0.159 (0.226) −0.004 (0.448)
Distance PFV break (PD) 0.156 (0.711) 0.010 (0.489)
Near NFV blur (PD) 0.394 (0.016)* 0.011 (0.085)
Near NFV break (PD) 0.566 (0.019)* −0.012 (0.209)
Near PFV blur (PD) 0.103 (0.803) −0.024 (0.139)
Near PFV break (PD) 0.156 (0.711) −0.041 (0.015)*
BAF (cpm) 0.014 (0.680) −0.152 (<0.001)*
MAF (cpm) 0.018 (0.425) −0.108 (0.020)*

*P<0.05. NFV: Negative fusional vergence, PD: Prism diopter, PFV: Positive fusional vergence, BAF: Binocular accommodative facility, cpm: Cycles per minute, MAF: Monocular accommodative facility