Table 3.
Crude model and adjusted model for Relationship between hyper triglyceridemic waist circumference phenotype and DII
| OR (95% CI) | β ± SE | P-trend | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude model | |||
| EWNT | 1.80 (0.91 to1.01) | 0.58 ± 0.34 | 0.08 |
| NWET | 1.74 (0.78 to 2.09) | 0.55 ± 0.4 | 0.17 |
| EWET | 2.07 (0.42 to 0.69) | 0.73 ± 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Adjusted modela | |||
| EWNT | 2.85 (0.77 to 0.86) | 1.04 ± 0.52 | 0.04 |
| NWET | 5.85 (0.56 to 0.72) | 1.76 ± 0.85 | 0.03 |
| EWET | 3.13 (0.86 to 0.98) | 1.14 ± 0.6 | 0.05 |
Bold values indicate the significant range as a tabular foot
Normal waist normal triglyceride (NWNT) Consider as reference
DII dietary inflammatory index, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, SE standard error, EWNT enlarged waist normal triglyceride, NWET normal waist enlarged triglyceride, EWET enlarged waist enlarged
aAdjusted for energy intake, age, plasma insulin levels, marriage status, educational status, economic status and familial obesity history, P value ≤ 0.05 is significant