Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr 23;27(10):3772–3780. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08475-w

Table 4:

Comparison of frail versus non-frail patients

Variable NON-FRAIL
n=911
FRAIL
n=71
P
Median age, years (range) 71 65-96 75 66-92 <0.001
Race
American Indian/Alaska Native 1 0.1 0 0.0 0.298
White 771 84.6 60 84.5
Asian 28 3.1 0 0.0
Black 48 5.3 7 9.9
Unknown 63 6.9 4 5.6
Median BMI, kg/m2 (range) 28.7 14.2-65.1 35.1 20-56.6 <0.001
ECOG performance status
0 720 79.1 6 8.5 <0.001
1 176 19.3 30 42.3
2 13 1.4 28 39.4
3 1 0.1 6 8.5
4 0 0.0 1 1.4
5 0 0.0 0 0.0
Previous abdominal surgery 472 51.8 35 49.3 0.683
Indication for surgery
Benign 62 6.8 2 2.8 0.047
Uterine hyperplasia 41 4.5 0 0.0
Uterine cancer 554 60.8 53 74.6
Breast cancer/risk-reducing 9 1.0 0 0.0
Benign adnexal mass 143 15.7 4 5.6
Ovarian/fallopian tube cancer 66 7.2 8 11.3
Cervical dysplasia 5 0.5 1 1.4
Cervical cancer 21 2.3 1 1.4
Two gynecologic primaries 4 0.4 0 0.0
Lymphoma 3 0.3 1 1.4
Other 3 0.3 1 1.4
Procedure
Minor 124 13.6 7 9.9 0.370
Major 787 86.4 64 90.1
Median estimated blood loss, cc (range) 50 0-800 50 10-300 0.070
Median uterine size, g (range) # n=777
90
27-740 n=62
115
39-429 0.015
Median operating room time, min (range) 154 40-476 149 61-417 0.700
Median length of hospital stay, days (range) 0 0-19 1 0-11 <0.001
Intraoperative complication 4 0.4 0 0 0.576
Postoperative complication 67 7.4 10 14.1 0.042
Major complication (grade 3-5) 18 2.0 5 7 0.007
Readmission within 30 days 30 3.3 4 5.6 0.299
Death within 90 days 3 0.3 2 2.8 0.05

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

#

only 839 patients were evaluated for uterine size