Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: BJU Int. 2013 Feb 26;111(7):1075–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11583.x

Table 3.

Extended vs no/standard pelvic LND.

No/standard pelvic LND, n (%) Extended pelvic LND, n (%) Total, n (%) OR (95% CI) P
Age group, years:
 ≤60 94 (29) 120 (27) 214 (28) Reference 1.0
 61–70 108 (34) 147 (33) 255 (33) 1.07 (0.74–1.54) 0.732
 71–80 98 (31) 135 (30) 233 (31) 1.08 (0.74–1.57) 0.691
 ≥81 19 (6) 41 (9) 60 (8) 1.69 (0.92–3.10) 0.090
Sex:
 Male 259 (81) 345 (78) 604 (79) Reference 1.0
 Female 61 (19) 100 (22) 161 (21) 1.23 (0.86–1.76) 0.254
Preoperative T stage:
 ≤T1 or CIS 103 (37) 100 (30) 203 (33) Reference 1.0
 T2 142 (52) 197 (59) 338 (56) 1.43 (1.01–2.03) 0.045
 ≥T3 30 (11) 36 (11) 66 (11) 1.24 (0.71–2.16) 0.456
Case number:
 1–10 85 (26) 67 (15) 152 (20) Reference 1.0
 11–25 98 (31) 95 (21) 193 (25) 1.23 (0.82–1.97) 0.342
 26–50 84 (26) 97 (22) 181 (24) 1.46 (0.95–2.26) 0.084
 ≥51 53 (17) 186 (42) 239 (31) 4.45 (2.86–6.93) <0.001
Surgeon volume, n:
 1–10 19 (7) 29 (7) 48 (7) Reference 1.0
 11–50 230 (86) 153 (34) 383 (54) 0.44 (0.24–0.80) 0.008
 ≥51 18 (7) 262 (59) 199 (39) 9.53 (4.50–20.2) <0.001
Institution volume, n:
 ≤100 298 (92) 259 (58) 557 (73) Reference 1.0
 ≥101 22 (7) 186 (42) 208 (27) 9.72 (6.07–16.60) <0.001
Pathological stage:
 ≤T2 197 (63) 247 (56) 444 (59) Reference 1.0
 T3 79 (25) 146 (33) 225 (30) 1.47 (1.06–2.05) 0.022
 T4 37 (12) 49 (11) 86 (11) 1.05 (0.66–1.68) 0.818
LN status:
 Negative 228 (75) 320 (72) 548 (73) Reference 1.0
 Positive 75 (25) 123 (28) 198 (27) 1.16 (0.84–1.63) 0.360