Table 1.
Comparison of conventional cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) tissue characterization and cardiac MR Fingerprinting (cMRF).
| Technique considerations | Conventional CMR Tissue Characterization | Cardiac MR Fingerprinting (cMRF) |
|---|---|---|
| Physiology | ECG-gated, breath-held | ECG-gated, breath-held |
| Gradient trajectory | Cartesian acquisition | Non-Cartesian (Spiral, Radial, Rosette) or Cartesian |
| Kspace sampling per image frame | Fully-sampled or mildly undersampled | Highly undersampled |
| Number of image frames | Up to 15 (e.g. 1 per heartbeat) | Hundreds (e.g. 48 per heartbeat) |
| Tissue properties mapped | One per acquisition (e.g. T1 or T2) | Multiple per acquisition (e.g. T1, T2, and M0) |
| Magnetization preparation | Inversion pulse or T2preparation pulse | Inversion pulse and T2−preparation pulse |
| Signal model | Exponential decay or recovery | Bloch equation magnetization vector |
| Quantification method | Curve fitting | Pattern matching to dictionary |