Table 2. Top models (ΔAICC<4) predicting SAIL mental health metrics.
Predicting SAIL Mental Health Domain | ||||||
Model | df | AICC | ΔAICC | Weight | Rank | R 2 |
1p) T* + SW + SB + P* | 12 | 1890.17 | .00 | .60 | 1 | .90 |
2p) T* + SW + SB + P* + SB:P | 13 | 1892.85 | 2.68 | .16 | 2 | .90 |
3p) T* + SW + SB + P* + T:SW | 13 | 1893.29 | 3.12 | .13 | 3 | .90 |
Predicting SAIL Population Coverage | ||||||
Model | df | AICC | ΔAICC | Weight | Rank | R 2 |
4p) T* + SW* + SB + PW + PB | 13 | 463.62 | .00 | .67 | 1 | .96 |
5p) T* + SW* + SB + PW + PB + T:PW | 14 | 467.48 | 3.86 | .10 | 2 | .96 |
6p) T* + SW* + SB + PW + PB + T:SW | 14 | 467.49 | 3.87 | .10 | 3 | .96 |
Predicting SAIL Continuity of Care | ||||||
Model | df | AICC | ΔAICC | Weight | Rank | R 2 |
7p) T* + S + P* + S:P | 12 | 3529.58 | .00 | .41 | 1 | .74 |
8p) T* + S + P* | 11 | 3529.71 | 0.13 | .39 | 2 | .73 |
Predicting SAIL Experience of Care | ||||||
Model | df | AICC | ΔAICC | Weight | Rank | R 2 |
9p) T* + SW* + SB + P | 12 | 2473.44 | .00 | .42 | 1 | .85 |
10p) T* + SW* + SB + P + T:SW | 13 | 2474.00 | 0.55 | .32 | 2 | .85 |
11p) T* + SW* + SB + P + T:P | 13 | 2476.26 | 2.82 | .10 | 3 | .85 |
Notes:
*Denotes that a random slope was included for the predictor.
All models included a random intercept. T = Time. S = Staffing (overall). SB = Staffing (between facilities). SW = Staffing (within facilities). P = Productivity (overall). PB = Productivity (between facilities). PW = Productivity (within facilities). R2 = pseudo-R2 as proposed by Snijders and Bosker [17].