Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 16;16(8):e0254166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254166

Table 6. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with thinness among rural school adolescent girls, 2020 (n = 376).

Variable Response Thinness COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
No Yes
DDS Inadequate 256 27 1.856(0.694–4.968) 1.658(0.605–4.544)
Adequate 88 5 1.0 1.0
Age category Early adolescent 97 9 2.366(0.705–7.935) 2.753(0.812–9.330)
Middle adolescent 145 19 3.341(1.104–10.114) 3.665(1.205–11.149) *
Late adolescent 102 4 1.0 1.0
Distance source water ≤30 263 28 1.0 1.0
>30 81 4 0.464(0.158–1.362) 0.403(0.136–1.194)
Wealth index Lowest class 93 11 1.092(0.468–2.548) 1.118(0.458–2.730)
Middle class 131 8 0.564(0.226–1.407) 0.586(0.231–1.484)
Upper class 120 13 1.0 1.0

* = p value<0.05, p-value of Hosmer and Lemeshow test: 0.343.