Table 2.
Fluency in Malevolent Creativity (MCT) and Use of Specific Strategies During Reappraisal of Anger-eliciting Events (RIT).
| Reappraisal strategies | R² | r | p | sr | B | SE | β | p | 95% CI [LL, UL] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem-oriented thinking | .14 | .08 | .511 | .06 | .05 | .09 | .07 | .626 | [-.14, .23] |
| Positive re-interpretations | .20 | .092 | .19 | .21 | .13 | .21 | .101 | [-.04, .47] | |
| De-emphasizing | .16 | .179 | .14 | .08 | .06 | .17 | .222 | [-.05, .20] | |
| Revenge-related ideation | .21 | .070 | .26 | .39 | .17 | .29 | .023 | [.06, .73] |
Note. Standard multiple regression analysis; F(4,68) = 2.67, p = .038; R² = proportions of variance explained by the model in total, r = Pearson correlation; sr = semipartial correlation, B = unstandardized beta weight, SE = standard error for B, β = standardized beta weight, CI = confidence interval, LL = lower limit, UL = upper limit.