Table 3.
Harmfulness of Malevolent Ideas (MCT) and Use of Specific Strategies During Reappraisal of Anger-eliciting Events (RIT).
| Reappraisal strategies | R² | r | p | sr | B | SE | β | p | 95% CI [LL, UL] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem-oriented thinking | .09 | -.20 | .092 | -.27 | -.02 | .01 | -.31 | .024 | [-.03, -.01] |
| Positive re-interpretations | -.13 | .263 | -.06 | -.01 | .01 | -.07 | .603 | [-.02, .01] | |
| De-emphasizing | -.10 | .393 | -.15 | -.01 | <.01 | -.19 | .187 | [-.01, .00] | |
| Revenge-related ideation | .02 | .889 | .06 | -.01 | .01 | .07 | .602 | [-.02, .03] |
Note. Standard multiple regression analysis; F(4,68) = 1.72, p = .157; R² = proportions of variance explained by the model in total, r = Pearson correlation; sr = semipartial correlation, B = unstandardized beta weight, SE = standard error for B, β = standardized beta weight, CI = confidence interval, LL = lower limit, UL = upper limit.