Table 1.
The users’ experience scores.
| Participant group and # | User Experience Questionnaire score | ||||||
|
|
|
Attractiveness | Perspicuity | Efficiency | Dependability | Stimulation | Novelty |
| Good benchmarka | 1.41 | 1.84 | 1.43 | 1.53 | 1.10 | 0.87 | |
| Observer | |||||||
|
|
O1 | 2.17 | 1.25 | 0.75 | 1.50 | –0.25 | 1.00 |
|
|
O2 | 1.67 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.25 | –0.75 | 1.00 |
|
|
O3 | 1.67 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.25 | –1.00 | 1.00 |
| Simulated patient | |||||||
|
|
S1 | 2.67 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
|
|
S2 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 1.25 |
|
|
S3 | 2.17 | 2.50 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 1.25 |
| Real patient | |||||||
|
|
P1 | 1.67 | 2.5 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.50 | 1.25 |
|
|
P2 | 2.17 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 1.50 | 1.00 |
|
|
P3 | N/Ab | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
aUpper limit of the general thresholds [19].
bN/A: not available; this patient withdrew from the trial because the app crashed.