Table 4.
Means across dimensions of acceptability across each cell of the 2 (number of devices)×2 (tailoring) factorial design.
| Acceptability dimension and tailoring | Devices, n | ||
|
|
Single, meana (SD) | Two, mean (SD) | |
| Interest | |||
|
|
Generic | 2.77 (1.13) | 3.02 (1.23) |
|
|
Tailored | 3.71 (1.05) | 3.85 (1.12) |
| Benefit | |||
|
|
Generic | 3.22 (1.10) | 3.45 (1.13) |
|
|
Tailored | 4.00 (0.95) | 4.05 (1.01) |
| Usefulness | |||
|
|
Generic | 3.09 (1.10) | 3.37 (1.16) |
|
|
Tailored | 3.98 (1.00) | 4.10 (0.97) |
| Enjoyment | |||
|
|
Generic | 2.78 (1.05) | 2.82 (1.14) |
|
|
Tailored | 3.58 (0.98) | 3.47 (1.17) |
| Confidence | |||
|
|
Generic | 4.15 (0.99) | 3.72 (1.29) |
|
|
Tailored | 4.41 (0.85) | 3.98 (1.12) |
| Difficulty | |||
|
|
Generic | 1.84 (1.06) | 2.52 (1.23) |
|
|
Tailored | 1.81 (1.04) | 2.39 (1.08) |
| Likelihood to participate | |||
|
|
Generic | 53.73 (30.18) | 51.65 (32.19) |
|
|
Tailored | 71.40 (27.32) | 64.55 (30.79) |
aAll mean ratings are on a 1-5 scale (1=not; 5=very) except for likelihood to participate, which is on a 1-100 scale.