Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;5(7):e27436. doi: 10.2196/27436

Table 1.

Hierarchical regression model of acceptance. N=258.a

Predictor Standardized coefficient β Unstandardized coefficient β, B T Determination coefficient, R² Changes in R², ΔR² P value
Step 1: sociodemographic and medical predictors 0.142 0.142

Gender −.204 −.533 −3.368

.001

Ageb −.053, .083 −.327, .260 −0.696, 1.193

.42

Mental disorder .240 .612 4.056

<.001
Step 2: mental health variables 0.204 0.063

GAD-7c .216 .047 1.934

.05

PHQ-2d −.028 −.018 −0.273

.76

Distress Thermometer [59] .119 .047 1.383

.17
Step 3: UTAUTe predictors 0.770 0.566

Performance expectancy .503 .487 10.340

<.001

Effort expectancy .150 .181 3.366

.001

Social influence .282 .328 6.268

<.001

aIn Steps 2 and 3, only the newly included variables are presented.

bAge was measured in categories and therefore has been included as a dummy variable. The category with the highest n (age: 45-54 years, n=70) was used as a reference. For β, B, and T minima, the maxima of each group contrast are presented. The P value was aggregated using the statistical software R; no single P value of each contrast reached statistical significance.

cGAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 [58].

dPHQ-2: Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [57].

eUTAUT: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.