Table 1.

Quality assessment scores.

Study	Methodology	Quality assessment score		Quality
		Value, n (%)	Total, N
Perilli et al (2012) [35]	Quantitative	15 (54)	28	Fair
Perilli et al (2013) [36]	Quantitative	15 (54)	28	Fair
Lancioni et al (2017) [37]	Quantitative	16 (57)	28	Fair
Lancioni et al (2018) [38]	Quantitative	14 (50)	28	Fair
Lancioni et al (2019) [39]	Quantitative	14 (50)	28	Fair
Thorpe et al (2019) [32]	Mixed methods (quantitative)	14 (50)	28	Fair
Thorpe et al (2019) [32]	Mixed methods (qualitative)	7 (70)	10	Moderate
Øksnebjerg et al (2020) [31]	Mixed methods (quantitative)	14 (50)	28	Fair
Øksnebjerg et al (2020) [31]	Mixed methods (qualitative)	9 (90)	10	High
Kerssens et al (2015) [33]	Mixed methods (quantitative)	15 (54)	28	Fair
Kerssens et al (2015) [33]	Mixed methods (qualitative)	6 (60)	10	Moderate
McGoldrick et al (2019) [40]	Mixed methods (quantitative)	17 (61)	28	Fair
McGoldrick et al (2019) [40]	Mixed methods (qualitative)	9 (90)	10	High
Kerkhof et al (2019) [34]	Qualitative	8 (80)	10	High
Boman et al (2014) [41]	Qualitative	7 (70)	10	Moderate