Table 1.
Metadata for the patient randomization, dropouts, and number of images from each group.
| Patient characteristics | Intervention period (Weeks 1-8) | Week 9 | Dropouts (n=6) | |||||||||
|
|
Feedback (n=8) | Basic (n=7) | Feedback (n=4) | Basic (n=4) |
|
|||||||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 47 (11) | 52 (9) | N/Aa | N/A | 48 (13) | |||||||
| Sex, n |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Male | 4 | 1 | N/A | N/A | 0 | ||||||
|
|
Female | 4 | 6 | N/A | N/A | 6 | ||||||
| Strata ratiob, n |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Not familiar | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A | 3 | ||||||
|
|
Familiar | 8 | 7 | N/A | N/A | 3 | ||||||
| Total number of images | 199 | 183 | 15 | 9 | N/A | |||||||
| Distribution of images per patient, mean (SD) | 24.88 (11.21) | 26.14 (10.59) | 1.88 (1.76) | 1.29 (1.39) | N/A | |||||||
| Number of images with color checker detected | 191 | 158 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||
| Subjective qualityc, n | 180 | 155 | 15 | 7 | N/A | |||||||
aN/A: not applicable.
bRatio of the number of patients that were not familiar to those who were familiar with smartphone camera usage.
cNumber of images manually labeled as good quality by the research assistant.