Table 1.
Difficulties in central priority setting | |
Can be driven by political ethos and time scales | |
Limited skill prioritizing answerable questions of importance to everyone concerned | |
Difficulties presented by the funding decision-making process | |
May be | made without knowledge of innovations in methodology in other specialties |
Unimaginative | |
Risk-averse | |
Self-serving | |
Biased | |
Difficulties at the level of research regulation and governance | |
Integrated Research Application System*(IRAS) | |
Research Ethics Committee* | |
Local Scientific Committees | |
Difficulties to do with health care organization partnerships | |
e.g. NHS support costs* | |
Difficulties to do with data acquisition | |
Quality* | |
Access* | |
Difficulties to do with carers | |
Clinical staff* | |
Attitudes* | |
Time constraints* | |
Families/other lay carers | |
Difficulties to do with patients | |
Illness-specific Attitude | |
Difficulties to do with research design | |
Explanatory v. pragmatic | |
Participants | |
Interventions | |
Outcomes | |
Consent practices disempowering participants | |
Less than transparent research practice | |
Difficulties in trial management | |
Staff issues | |
Trail unit ethos |
*Mentioned in Leeson & Tyrer (2013).