Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 14;24(5):446–457. doi: 10.1017/S2045796014000419

Table 2.

Employment and education outcomes in SE studies with early psychosis clients

Primary author Year of publication N % Competitively employed during follow-up Estimated increase from baseline (employment) % Education enrolments during follow-up Estimated increase from baseline (education)
Pre-post evaluations without comparison groups
Rinaldi 2004 40 28% 18% 33% 0%
Rinaldi 2010b 142 44% 31% 28% 3%
Porteous 2007 100 Cohort 1: 36% 36% 13% 13%
Porteous 2009 125 Cohort 2: 59% 59% 16% 16%
135 47% 47% 21% 21%
Quasi-experimental evaluation
Major 2009 SE: 44 Ctl:70 SE: 36% Ctl: 19% SE: 23% Ctl: 5% SE: 20% Ctl: 24% SE: 6% Control: 7%
Randomised controlled trials
Killackey 2008 SE: 20 Ctl: 21 SE: 65% Ctl: 10% SE: 60% Ctl: 0% SE: 35% Ctl: 24% SE: 35% Ctl: 24%
Killackey 2012 SE: 67 Ctl: 59 SE: 72% Ctl: 48% SE: 50% Ctl: 37% SE: 54% Ctl: 41% SE: 38% Ctl: 22%
Nuechterlein submitted SE: 36 Ctl: 15 SE: 69% Ctl: 33% SE: 45% Ctl: 16% SE: 67% Ctl: 53% SE: 41% Ctl: 44%
Total (all studies) SE 709 49% 41% 27% 11%
Ctl 165 29% 17% 33% 15%
Effect size 0.41 0.54 −0.13 −0.12
χ2 (1) = 21.6, p < 0.0001 χ2 (1) = 2.3, n.s.

SE, supported employment; Ctl, control group.