Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;51(4):264–275. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2001100055

Table 1. Alveolar bone resorption in the distal root and furcation shown by microtomography analysis.

Groups Region Alveolar bone resorption P valuea)
A Furca 0.60±0.20 vs.0.75±0.57 0.522
Lingual (DR) 1.06±0.16 vs. 1.25±0.23 0.090
Vestibular (DR) 1.14±0.17 vs. 1.19±0.33 0.700
Mean value 1.10±0.12 vs. 1.22±0.22 0.210
B Furca 0.28±0.07 vs. 0.63±0.50 0.119
Lingual (DR) 0.95±0.83 vs. 1.05±0.28 0.399
Vestibular (DR) 0.90±0.14 vs. 0.82±0.18 0.383
Mean value (DR) 0.93±0.1 vs. 0.94±0.22 0.927
C Furca 0.86±0.77 vs. 0.91±1.06 0.933
Lingual (DR) 0.96±0.12 vs. 1.23±0.64 0.001
Vestibular (DR) 0.89±0.15 vs. 1.36±0.28 0.003
Mean value (DR) 0.91±0.12 vs. 1.30±0.6 <0.001

Data are shown as mean±standard deviation. Values in mm.

Groups are represented as below: A, ZOL/Lig30 vs. Con/Lig30; B, ZOL/Lig15 vs. Con/Lig15; C, Lig/ZOL vs. Lig/Con.

DR: distal root, ZOL: zoledronic acid.

a)Student's t-test.