Table 1. Alveolar bone resorption in the distal root and furcation shown by microtomography analysis.
Groups | Region | Alveolar bone resorption | P valuea) |
---|---|---|---|
A | Furca | 0.60±0.20 vs.0.75±0.57 | 0.522 |
Lingual (DR) | 1.06±0.16 vs. 1.25±0.23 | 0.090 | |
Vestibular (DR) | 1.14±0.17 vs. 1.19±0.33 | 0.700 | |
Mean value | 1.10±0.12 vs. 1.22±0.22 | 0.210 | |
B | Furca | 0.28±0.07 vs. 0.63±0.50 | 0.119 |
Lingual (DR) | 0.95±0.83 vs. 1.05±0.28 | 0.399 | |
Vestibular (DR) | 0.90±0.14 vs. 0.82±0.18 | 0.383 | |
Mean value (DR) | 0.93±0.1 vs. 0.94±0.22 | 0.927 | |
C | Furca | 0.86±0.77 vs. 0.91±1.06 | 0.933 |
Lingual (DR) | 0.96±0.12 vs. 1.23±0.64 | 0.001 | |
Vestibular (DR) | 0.89±0.15 vs. 1.36±0.28 | 0.003 | |
Mean value (DR) | 0.91±0.12 vs. 1.30±0.6 | <0.001 |
Data are shown as mean±standard deviation. Values in mm.
Groups are represented as below: A, ZOL/Lig30 vs. Con/Lig30; B, ZOL/Lig15 vs. Con/Lig15; C, Lig/ZOL vs. Lig/Con.
DR: distal root, ZOL: zoledronic acid.
a)Student's t-test.