Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;12:641919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641919
References Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Total Quality
Santarossa (2015) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100%
Blassingame (2020a) 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 83.3%
Cohen et al. (2017) 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 66.7%
Rodgers et al. (2020) 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 83.3%
Suplee (2018) 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 83.3%
Ferguson et al. (2013) 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 66.7%
Latzer et al. (2015) 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 83.3%
Mabe et al. (2014) 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 66.7%
Acar et al. (2020) 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 66.7%
Pollack (2017) 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 66.7%
Walker et al. (2015) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100.0%
Griffiths et al. (2018a) 1 1 1 1 0 1 5 83.3%
Teo and Collinson (2019) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100.0%
Howard et al. (2017) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100.0%
Slater and Tiggemann (2014) 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 83.3%
Zeeni et al. (2018) 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 66.7%
Niu et al. (2019) 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 83.3%
Aparicio-Martinez et al. (2019) 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 83.3%
Griffiths et al. (2018b) 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 66.7%
Fardouly et al. (2020) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100.0%
Wilksch et al. (2019) 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 66.7%
Schreyer-Hoffman (2020) 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 83.3%

Q1 Sampling method: Was it representative of the population intended in the study?.

Q2 Was a response rate mentioned within the study? (Respond no if response rate was below 60%).

Q3 Was the measurement tool of disordered eating behaviors valid and reliable?

Q4 Was the data source primary or secondary?.

Q5 Was SNSs usage examined in the study in a valid and reliable way?

Q6 Was the relationship or association between disordered eating behaviors and SNSs explored?