Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 13;39:101076. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101076

Table 3.

Vaccine efficacy of the 1790GAHB vaccine versus placebo against evaluated endpoints (per-protocol set).

Endpoint Measured outcome
Vaccine efficacy
p-value*
1790GAHB group (N = 32)
Placebo group (N = 28)
n Value (90% CI) n Value (90% CI) % (90% CI)
1 Rate of shigellosis, 1st definition (primary endpoint) (%) 15 46·9 (31·5; 62·7) 12 42·9 (26·9; 60·0) −9·4 (−96·7; 33·7) 0·4266
2 Rate of shigellosis, 2nd definition (%) 15 46·9 (31·5; 62·7) 9 32·1 (17·9; 49·4) −45·8 (−173·1; 17·4) 0·1485
3 Rate of shigellosis, 3rd definition (%) 15 46·9 (31·5; 62·7) 10 35·7 (20·8; 53·0) −31·3 (−130·1; 22·9) 0·2917
4 Rate of more severe shigellosis (%) 5 15·6 (6·4; 30·1) 4 14·3 (5·0; 29·8) −9·4 (−275·6; 62·7) 0·4787
5 Shedding of S. sonnei strain 53 G (%) 31 96·9 (86·0; 99·8) 28 100·0 (89·9; 100·0) 3·1 (−7·0; 14·0) 0·2763
6 Severe diarrhoea (%) 13 40·6 (26·0; 56·7) 7 25·0 (12·4; 41·9) −62·5 (−270·3; 17·0) 0·1228
7 More severe diarrhoea (%) 11 34·4 (20·6; 50·4) 5 17·9 (7·3; 33·9) −92·5 (−534·8; 11·7) 0·0965
8 Dysentery (%) 11 34·4 (20·6; 50·4) 8 28·6 (15·1; 45·7) −20·3 (−137·4; 37·2) 0·3479
9 Mean weight of all Grade 3–5 stools (grams) 114·2 (41·2; 316·2) 147·3 (58·7; 369·4) 0·7579
10 Total number of all Grade 3–5 stools⁎⁎ 327 172 0·1362⁎⁎⁎
11 Confirmed S. sonnei 53 G shedding and moderate/severe diarrhoea (%) 15 46·9 (31·5; 62·7) 12 42·9 (26·9; 60·0) −9·4 (−96·7; 33·7) 0·4266
12 Disease not fulfilling the protocol primary case definition for shigellosis associated or not with mild to moderate symptoms (%) 16 50·0 (34·4; 65·6) 17 60·7 (43·5; 76·2) 17·6 (−23·4; 47·3) 0·2917

P-value from one-sided test, not adjusted for multiple comparisons, with #1 being the primary endpoint and the remaining 11, secondary endpoints.

⁎⁎

Mean number of stools per participant (± standard deviation): 28.0 ± 13.0 (1790GAHB group) and 13.9 ± 6.6 (Placebo group).

⁎⁎⁎

p-value calculated to compare the mean number of stools. N, number of participants; n, number of participants in each category; CI, confidence interval.

Note: P-values for endpoints 2–8 and 11–12 were calculated in post-hoc analyses.