Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(4):334–343. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000844

Table 1.

List of examples of nutritional guidelines on COVID-19 patients referring to indirect calorimetry

Title Authors
Journal
Publication Online/Final Statement about Indirect Calorimetry
ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection Barazzoni et al.
Clinical Nutrition
March 2020
June 2020
Energy needs can be assessed using indirect calorimetry if safely available with ensured sterility of the measurement system
Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Martindale et al.
JPEN
May 2020
Sept 2020
While energy requirements can ideally be determined by indirect calorimetry, this technology would involve contamination of equipment and additional exposure to healthcare providers. Thus, we recommend utilizing weight-based equations instead of indirect calorimetry to estimate energy requirements as a practical matter for the COVID-19 patients.
Nutrition Support in the ICU—A Refresher in the Era of COVID-19 Micic et al.
Am J Gastroenterol
July 2020
Sept 2020
Although energy expenditure is best measured by indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients, the prolonged time needed for these measures increases clinician risk for viral exposure and is contrary to the principle of “clustering care,” in which patient care is bundled to limit provider exposures.
Consider indirect calorimetry if prolonged intubation (>7 days)
Nutrition of the COVID-19 patient in the intensive care unit (ICU): a practical guidance Thibault et al.
Crit Care
July 2020
July 2020
IC is the reference method to assess the energy requirements in the non-COVID-19 ICU patients
Indirect calorimetry should be proposed only for patients staying for more than 10 days in the ICU or those on full parenteral nutrition (PN) to avoid overfeeding.
Easy-to-prescribe nutrition support in the intensive care in the era of COVID-19 De Watteville et al
Clin Nutr Espen
July 2020
Oct 2020
Due to the lack of resources and the high risk of contagion, in- direct calorimetry (IC) measurements were not used to measure patients’ energy expenditure.
Practical guidance for the use of indirect calorimetry during COVID 19 pandemic Singer P
Clin Nutr Exp
July 2020
Oct 2020
It is mandatory to ensure health professional safety while assessing resting energy expenditure using metabolic monitors.
Indirect calorimetry (IC) remains the best tool to assess resting energy expenditure in critically ill patients and ESPEN as well as ASPEN societies recommend its use.