Table 4.
Sequencing data and the alpha diversity in each group of sows.1
| Item | G100 |
L14 |
SEM |
P-values |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | FLA | CON | FLA | Diet | Stage | Diet × Stage | ||
| Seq_num | 37,236.40 | 35,306.80 | 36,122.60 | 35,546.80 | 425.43 | 0.16 | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| OTU_num | 701.80 | 708.80 | 621.60 | 597.00 | 12.58 | 0.73 | <0.01 | 0.54 |
| Shannon | 4.84 | 4.97 | 4.80 | 4.58 | 0.04 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Simpson | 0.020 | 0.017 | 0.020 | 0.024 | 0.001 | 0.87 | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| ACE | 809.51 | 820.79 | 713.66 | 700.84 | 16.61 | 0.98 | 0.01 | 0.72 |
| Chao | 820.16 | 823.74 | 715.00 | 704.77 | 16.56 | 0.92 | <0.01 | 0.84 |
| Coverage | 0.996 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.996 | <0.001 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 0.76 |
Seq_num = sequence number; OTU_num = operational taxonomic unit number; ACE = abundance-based coverage estimator.
Sows were regarded as the experimental units, n = 5 for each group. G100: d 100 of gestation; L14: d 14 of lactation; CON, control group, basal diet; FLA, flavor supplementary group, basal diet + feed flavor supplement at 1 g/kg. When significant main effects or interactive effects were observed, the means were compared using the least significant difference method with a P < 0.05 indicating significance.