Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb 17;29(10):5673–5680. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06036-9

Table 2.

Two-sample t-test comparisons of financial toxicity scores between demographic subgroups (N = 104)

Characteristic Mean (SD) for FT^ |t| (p value)
Sex
 Male 24.2 (11.3) 0.4 (.73)
 Female 25.0 (9.2)
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic 24.5 (10.6) 0.3 (.79)
 Other race/ethnicity 25.5 (7.9)
Education
 At most high school 25.8 (9.8) 1.0 (.34)
 At least some college 23.8 (10.9)
Annual family income
 < $35,000 27.8 (9.9) 3.1 (.003)*
 ≥ $35,000 21.4 (10.3)
Family income above federal poverty level
 Yes 23.4 (10.7) 2.0 (.047)*
 No 28.3 (9.0)
Employed
 Yes 22.0 (10.2) 2.0 (.048)*
 No 26.2 (10.2)
Location
 Rural 26.3 (11.0) 1.9 (.059)
 Urban 22.4 (9.3)
Appalachian
 Yes 23.5 (10.0) 1.2 (.25)
 No 26.0 (10.9)
Private insurance
 Yes 22.1 (10.1) 2.1 (.038)*
 No 26.5 (10.3)
Cancer stage at diagnosis
 I or II 23.0 (10.7) 0.4 (.69)
 III or IV 24.1 (10.4)
High health insurance literacy (confidence and behaviors, HILM)
 Yes 17.7 (9.0) 3.6 (<.001)*
 No 26.5 (10.1)
High health insurance literacy (knowledge, HIKM)
 Yes 23.3 (10.4) 1.3 (.19)
 No 26.1 (10.4)
High numeracy
 Yes 16.3 (9.9) 3.8 (<.001)*
 No 26.2 (9.7)
^

FT financial toxicity

*

p < .05