Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 3;29(4):1077–1087. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00812-3

Table 4.

Comparisons between demographic data and burnout

Intermediate pattern of burnout
No (n = 25) Yes (n = 79) p value Odds ratio (95% CI)
Focus of current study
  Basic sciences 8 (32%) 26 (33.3%) 0.550a
  Clinical sciences 5 (20%) 23 (29.5%)
  Research 12 (48%) 29 (37.2%)
Age
  21–29 20 (80%) 70 (88.6%) 0.272a 0.51 (0.16–1.71)
  30–39 5 (20%) 9 (11.4%)
Gender
  Female 14 (56%) 36 (46.2%) 0.391a 1.46 (0.60–3.68)
  Male 11 (44%) 42 (53.8%)
Relationship status
  Married 6 (25%) 10 (12.8%) 0.151a 2.27 (0.73–7.07)
  Single 18 (75%) 68 (87.2%)
Highest educational achievement
  Bachelor’s degree 20 (80%) 66 (83.5%) 0.683a 0.79 (0.25–2.48)
  Master’s degree or doctor of philosophy 5 (20%) 13 (16.5%)
Part-time work
  Yes 2 (8%) 5 (6.3%) 0.771a 1.29 (0.23–7.08)
  No 23 (92%) 74 (93.7%)
Psychiatric history
  Yes 0 (0%) 3 (3.8%) 0.430b
  No 25 (100%) 75 (96.2%)

aChi-square test

bFisher’s exact test (one-sided)