Table 2.
ALG and iRAT scores and percentage of participation in ALG and TBL of students in the upper and lower 33rd percentiles of ALG and iRAT scores
| ALG scores | iRAT scores | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper 33rd Percentile | Lower 33rd Percentile | Upper 33rd Percentile | Lower 33rd Percentile | ||
| ALG Scores | Full Class | 4.94 (0.06)** | 4.10 (0.06) | 4.59 (0.25) | 4.56 (0.45) |
| Average (Standard Deviation) | Study Group | 4.73 (0.06)** | 4.10 (0.30) | 4.42 (0.20) | 4.44 (0.34) |
| iRAT Scores | Full Class | 6.79 (1.08) | 6.74 (1.07) | 8.15 (0.59)** | 5.82 (0.36) |
| Average (Standard Deviation) | Study Group | 6.58 (2.06) | 7.00 (1.90) | 8.25 (1.43)** | 5.95 (1.73) |
| Percentage of Participation in ALG | Full Class | - | - | - | - |
| Average (Standard Deviation) | Study Group | 15.96 (6.26)** | 9.17 (6.93) | 14.06 (7.41) | 11.90 (7.83) |
| Percentage of Participation in TBL/gRAT | Full Class | - | - | - | - |
| Average (Standard Deviation) | Study Group | 17.81 (8.23)** | 12.50 (7.12) | 22.10 (9.67)** | 15.53 (9.38) |
**p<0.01
Table from Carrasco GA, Behling KC, and Lopez OJ, Evaluation of the role of incentive structure on student participation and performance in active learning strategies: a comparison of case-based and team-based learning [27]. Active learning group (ALG) = case-based learning (CBL).
Available from doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408899