Table 2.
Hierarchical Multiple regression analysis results of main (step 1) and interaction effects (step 2).
| Step 1 – Main Effects | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | ß | R2 | |
| 0.52*** | |||
| Resilience | −0.39*** | ||
| Acceptance | 0.14 | ||
| Active Coping | −0.18 | ||
| Behavioral Disengagement | −0.84 | ||
| Denial | 0.69 | ||
| Emotional Support | −1.11* | ||
| Humor | −0.22 | ||
| Instrumental Support | 1.59*** | ||
| Planning | 0.25 | ||
| Positive Reframing | −0.71 | ||
| Religion | 0.21 | ||
| Self-Blame | 1.92*** | ||
| Self-Distraction | 1.32*** | ||
| Substance Use | 1.08* | ||
| Venting |
0.64 |
||
| Step 2 – Interactions Between Resilience and Coping Strategies | |||
| Variables |
ß |
R2 |
|
| 0.61*** | 0.089 | ||
| Resilience x Acceptance | 0.06 | ||
| Resilience x Active Coping | −0.04 | ||
| Resilience x Behavioral Disengagement | −0.29 | ||
| Resilience x Denial | 0.06 | ||
| Resilience x Emotional Support | −0.17 | ||
| Resilience x Humor | −0.08 | ||
| Resilience x Instrumental Support | 0.06 | ||
| Resilience x Planning | −0.18* | ||
| Resilience x Positive Reframing | 0.09 | ||
| Resilience x Religion | 0.02 | ||
| Resilience x Self-Blame | 0.25* | ||
| Resilience x Self-Distraction | 0.12 | ||
| Resilience x Substance Use | 0.10 | ||
| Resilience x Venting | −0.10 | ||
Note. Beta values represent standardized values at final model. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.