Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 17;37(3):426–433. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01928-6

Table 1.

Comparison of patients with and without right ventricular dysfunction

Parameter Normal RV function (RVS ≤− 20.2%) Abnormal RV function (RVS > − 20.2%) P value
Number of patients 90 23
Male (%) 72 28 0.02
Female (%) 91 9
Median age (years) 54 68 0.004
Median TAPSE (mm) 23 15  < 0.0001
Median RV end-diastolic length (mm) 83 91 0.003
LFS (%) − 28 − 17  < 0.0001
End-diastolic RV area (cm2) 18 21 0.01
End-systolic RV area (cm2) 9 13 0.0003
FAC (%) 0.49 0.36  < 0.0001
Tricuspid S wave (cm/s) 15 8  < 0.0001
Tei index 0.34 0.55  < 0.0001
Transtricuspid pressure gradient (mm Hg) 21 30 0.008
Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure estimate (mm Hg) 28 35 0.01

TAPSE tricuspid annular systolic excursion, RV right ventricle, LFS longitudinal fractional shortening, FAC fractional area change