Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 29;20(6):2205–2230. doi: 10.1177/1471301220980243

Table 1.

Results of the quality appraisal for included studies.

Category of study design Quality criteria Celdrán et al. (2009) Celdrán et al. (2011) Celdrán et al. (2012) Celdrán et al. (2014) Creasey and Jarvis (1989) Creasey et al. (1989)
Screening questions Are there clear research questions?
Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?
Qualitative Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question?
Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question?
Are the findings adequately derived from the data?
Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data?
Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation?
Quantitative non-randomised Are the participants representative of the target population?
Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and exposure?
Are there complete outcome data?
Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis?
During the study period, has the exposure occurred as intended?
Quantitative descriptive Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question?
Is the sample representative of the target population?
Are the measurements appropriate?
Is the risk of non-response bias low? Can’t tell
Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?
Mixed methods Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed method design to address the research question?
Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question?
Are outputs of integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted?
Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed?
Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?