Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 20;105:357–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.074

Table 5.

Parasitic loads of transmitting and non-transmitting T. cruzi seropositive mothers. Data from Rendell and colleagues are not reported here due to overlapping data with Kaplinski and colleagues (Kaplinski et al., 2015; Rendell et al., 2015).

Study Transmitting mothers
Non-transmitting mothers
Reported statistic Method
N Parasitic load (mean ± standard deviation) N Parasitic load (mean ± standard deviation)

Bern et al., 2009 10 85.6 ± 109.7 eP/mL 144 20.9 ± 84.3 eP/mL P < 0.01 qPCR with primer set Cruzi 1 and Cruzi 2
Kaplinski et al., 2015 * 31 97.5 ± 138.5 eP/mL 41 9.9 ± 22.7 eP/mL P < 0.0001 qPCR with primer set Cruzi 1 and Cruzi 2
Bua et al., 2012 20 11 ± 2.7 eP/mL 20 1.8 ± 0.5 eP/mL P < 0.05 SYBR GreenER qPCR SuperMix Universal kit
Buekens et al., 2018 11 8.6 ± 11.8 eP/mL 336 5.7 ± 7.4 eP/mL qPCR with primer sets Tcz1-Tcz2 and 121–122
Brutus et al., 2010 26.4 ± 22.3 p/mm3 3.5 ± 8.4 p/mm3 P = 0.001 Microscopic examination of parasites in buffy coat of heparinized microhematocrit tubes

eP/mL: equivalent parasites per milliliter. p/mm3: parasites per cubic millimeter.

*

Means and standard deviations were estimated from the medians and interquartile ranges (See Methods).

This study included 147 T. cruzi seropositive mothers but did not report the number of transmitting and non-transmitting women.