Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2021 Mar 16;372(6537):56–62. doi: 10.1126/science.abc7717

Fig. 2. Simulated D/H evolution for different assumptions of crustal hydration and atmospheric escape rates.

Fig. 2.

(A to C) The evolution of the D/H of the exchangeable reservoir in our simulation. Most parameters, including Xex,0, are fixed; Rex,end is a free parameter to visualize the model sensitivity. The colored lines show results for different assumptions of the flux rates. The large range of D/H measurements from meteorite, rover, and telescope observations are indicated with gray rectangles (fig. S1). (A) Effects of increasing the Noachian escape flux (Fesc,N). (B) Effects of increasing the Hesperian escape flux (Fesc,H). (C) Effects of increasing the Noachian (Fcrust,N) and Hesperian (Fcrust,H) crustal hydration fluxes. When Fcrust,N increases, the exchangeable reservoir becomes smaller, inducing larger fractionations during the Noachian. When Fcrust,H increases, the allowed values of Fcrust,N decrease, causing less fractionation during the Noachian.