Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;12(8):1245–1252. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00032

Table 2. Transcriptional Reporter Assay Activity of 9–16 and 19–29 in LNCaP F877L (Mutant) and LNCaP AR cs (WT) Cells.

compound LNCaP F877La IC50 (nM)b LNCaP WTa IC50 (nM)b
1 not fit 117 ± 66
4 98 ± 63 191 ± 120
9 >15000c >15000d
10 5012 ± 207 11220 ± 3826e
11 676 ± 170 1380 ± 141
12 525 ± 322 646 ± 113
13 759 ± 81 1096 ± 7
14 339 ± 119 398 ± 52
15 1660 ± 1081 >30000
16 178 ± 86 219 ± 116
18 145 ± 32 112 ± 28
19 93 ± 32 93 ± 30
20 102 ± 10 100 ± 20
21 123 ± 39 126 ± 8
22 257 ± 13 191 ± 11
23 170 ± 37 229 ± 25
24 132 ± 33 148 ± 39
25 174 ± 4 209 ± 6
(S)-26 112 ± 116 178 ± 41
(S)-27 151 ± 26 170 ± 19
(R)-28 65 ± 47 52 ± 37
(R)-29 78 ± 10 72 ± 23
a

LNCaP F877L and LNCaP WT reporter assays were repeated two times or more. All compounds except 1 were antagonists in AR F877L, and all were antagonists in the AR WT.

b

Max inhibition >90% for all compounds unless specifically mentioned.

c

Max inhibition 52%.

d

Max inhibition 35%.

e

Max inhibition 80%.