Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 17;65(9):e00698-21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00698-21

TABLE 3.

The impacts of definitive antimicrobial regimens on the mortality of patients with CRE-BSI

Antimicrobial regimena No. of deceased patients/total no. of patients (%) Logistic regression
Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95% CI) P value Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P value
CAZ-AVI 3/13 (23.1) Reference Reference
CAZ-AVI + tigecycline 2/13 (15.4) 0.606 (0.083–4.405) 0.621 1.645 (0.106–25.422) 0.722
CAZ-AVI + tigecycline + polymyxin B sulfate 1/9 (11.1) 0.417 (0.036–4.813) 0.483 0.606 (0.016–23.056) 0.788
Other regimens 72/152 (47.4) 3.000 (0.794–11.331) 0.105 12.407 (1.684–31.430) 0.011
 Tigecycline + polymyxin B sulfate 19/46 (41.3) 2.346 (0.568–9.679) 0.238 13.674 (1.160–26.148) 0.040
 Carbapenem + tigecycline + polymyxin B sulfate 16/44 (36.4) 1.905 (0.456–7.951) 0.377 8.295 (1.041–16.123) 0.046
 Carbapenem + polymyxin B sulfate + aminoglycoside 5/13 (38.5) 2.083 (0.378–11.482) 0.399 13.564 (1.160–26.148) 0.038
 Carbapenem + tigecycline 11/14 (78.6) 7.222 (1.444–16.444) 0.016 29.810 (1.835–69.751) 0.037
 Tigecycline 13/19 (68.4) 12.222 (1.990–25.060) 0.007 33.121 (3.322–69.322) 0.005
 Carbapenem + aminoglycoside 8/16 (50.0) 3.333 (0.660–16.847) 0.145 24.250 (1.989–52.579) 0.012
a

CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam.

b

Adjusted for Pitt score, meropenem MIC of ≥8 mg/liter, immunocompromised status, source control of infection, and appropriate empirical therapy.