Table 3.
Generalization of features‘ to further motor recovery scores
| Patient group | Time point | Motor score | r | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEOUL (63 patients) | TA | Proportional recovery score | 0.3 | <0.001 |
| TC − TA | 0.33 | <0.001 | ||
| SEOUL severe (36 patients) | TA | 0.27 | 0.029 | |
| TC − TA | 0.31 | 0.01 | ||
| SEOUL (63 patients) | TA | PCA composite score | 0.23 | <0.01 |
| TC − TA | 0.2 | 0.024 | ||
| SEOUL severe (36 patients) | TA | 0.44 | <0.001 | |
| TC − TA | 0.44 | <0.001 | ||
| SEOUL, GENEVA, PARIS (92 patients) | TA | Grip strength | 0.21 | <0.01 |
| SEOUL, GENEVA, PARIS (87 patients) | TC − TA | 0.23 | <0.01 |
PCA composite scores were built based on measurements of hand grip strength, pinch grip strength, and box and block test scores. Grip strength was normalized to sex, age and hand dominance. Those variables were correlated with posterior probabilities of SVM classifiers.