Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 17;16(8):e0253337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253337

Table 3. Comparison of outcomes between KTx recipients with IgAN as primary cause of ESKD and those with other types of glomerular diseases.

Characteristic IgAN-KTx LN-KTx PIGN-KTx IMN-KTx FSGS-KTx
Mean (±sd), median(IQR) or N (%) Ν = 99 N = 22 N = 21 N = 19 N = 44
Ser. creatinine 1st year (mg/dl) 1.51(0.52) 1.42 (0.39) p = 0.44 1.45 (0.36) p = 0.61 1.58 (0.65) p = 0.60 1.73 (0.80) p = 0.05
Estimated GFR at 1st year (ml/min/1.73 m2) 56.0(17.6) 56.5 (16.9) p = 0.71 54.15 (18.7) p = 0.66 48.9 (18.9) p = 0.11 49.9 (11.9) p = 0.0038
Ser. creatinine end fup (mg/dl) 1.55 (0.49) 1.48 (0.3) p = 0.52 1.74 (0.99) p = 0.19 1.53 (0.76) p = 0.88 1.61 (0.7) p = 0.59
Estimated GFR at end of fup (ml/min) 50.5 (15.4) 56.5 (9.9) p = 0.08 46.8 (11.4) p = 0.30 53.1 (20.9) p = 0.52 51.6 (20.9) p = 0.61
24h proteinuria 1st year (mg/day) 154(140) 199.5 (187.5) p = 0.54 110 (93) p = 0.054 209 (600) p = 0.07 585.5 (2875) p = 0.0008
24h proteinuria end fup (mg/day) 157 (212) 60.5 (442) p = 0.18 275(455) p = 0.12 184(243) p = 0.47 1250 (5608) p = 0.0001
Primary disease recurrence (graft) 23 (23.2) 0 p = 0.01 0 p = 0.01 8 (42.1) p = 0.17 26 (59.1)) p<0.0001
Acute rejection, (ever) 11 (11.1) 1 (4.5) p = 0.35 1 (4.7) p = 0.33 3 (9.5) p = 0.83 3 (6.8) p = 0.42
Cumulative graft loss end fup 11 (11.1) 3 (13.6) p = 0.74 2 (9.5) p = 0.81 3 (14.2) p = 0.77 9 (20.45) p = 0.13
Graft loss due to primary disease recurrence 2 (2.0) 0 p = 0.55 0 p = 0.53 0 p = 0.5 5 (11.4) p = 0.0165
Alive with functioning graft 85 (85.9) 18 (81.8) p = 0.62 17 (80.95) p = 0.56 18 (85.7) p = 0.98 34 (77.2) p = 0.2
Follow-up (months) 103.4 (60.9) 80.2 (56.7) p = 0.087 81.2 (50.1) p = 0.1 72.9 (38.7) p = 0.032 64.95 (50.7) p = 0.0003

Abbreviations: IgAN; IgA nephropathy, FSGS; focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, IMN; idiopathic membranous nephropathy, LN; lupus nephropathy, PIGN; pauci-immune glomerulonephritis, ESKD; end-stage kidney disease, GFR; glomerular filtration rate.

Comparisons between the IgAN-KTx group versus all other groups of KTx recipients is depicted by presenting the p-value (p) in each category separately.