Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 17;16(8):e0255879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255879

Table 8. Comparison of PSA and IRV scores of 11 selected species.

Species P of PSA R Score Difference Percent change S of PSA V Score Difference Percent change
Ablennes hians 1.00 1.25 -0.25 25.00 1.00 2.60 -1.60 160.00
Alepes djeddaba 2.73 2.43 0.30 10.99 1.86 2.42 -0.56 30.11
Alepes klenii 2.56 2.14 0.42 16.41 2.14 2.17 -0.03 1.40
Arius jella 1.67 1.86 -0.19 11.38 2.29 2.00 0.29 12.66
Carcharhinus limbatus 1.11 1.83 -0.72 64.86 2.14 2.33 -0.19 8.88
Parapenaeopsis stylifera 2.56 2.56 0.00 0.00 2.29 1.85 0.44 19.21
Uroteuthis duvaucelli 2.56 2.03 0.53 20.70 1.71 2.20 -0.49 28.65
Portunus pelagicus 2.67 2.48 0.19 7.12 2.14 2.33 -0.19 8.88
Sepia pharaonis 2.33 2.22 0.11 4.72 2.25 2.20 0.05 2.22
Sphyrna lewini 1.36 1.67 -0.31 22.79 1.57 2.50 -0.93 59.24
Carcharhinus sorrah 1.22 1.00 0.22 18.03 1.86 2.60 -0.74 39.78
Average 18.4 33.7

P indicates the productivity score of PSA and S indicates the susceptibility score of PSA. R and V scores are based on the current method. The percentage difference is based on absolute values.