Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 4;12:693333. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.693333

Table 3.

CSA estimates and inter-scanner repeatability of CSA across scanner sites using different software methods at different cord levels for brain or SC MRI.

CSA Inter-scanner repeatability (6 scanners, 3 repeats)
Software method Vertebral level N CSA
Mean ± SDsites
[mm2]
MMOD
max. abs. Δscans [mm2]
CV
[%]
Cord MRI SCT C1–C2 18 67.63 ± 1.5 1.39 1.1
NQL C1–C2 18 75.35 ± 0.81 1.32 0.9
ASM C1–C2 18 75.96 ± 0.85 0.91 0.6
SCT C2/3 17 67.25 ± 1.97 1.87 1.6
NQL C2/3 18 69.43 ± 0.95 1.55 1.2
ASM C2/3 18 73.47 ± 2.1 3.44 2.6
SCT C1–C7 15 68.41 ± 2.55 1.27 1.0
NQL C1–C7 15 74.54 ± 0.6 0.58 0.4
ASM C1–C7 15 72.17 ± 0.64 0.90 0.6
Brain MRI SCT C1–C2 18 65.88 ± 1.77 1.98 1.6
NQL C1–C2 18 74.48 ± 1.3 1.07 0.8
ASM C1–C2 18 74.66 ± 1.34 1.01 0.7
SCT C2/3 17 66.56 ± 1.99 2.20 2.0
NQL C2/3 18 67.83 ± 2.16 3.11 2.6
ASM C2/3 18 72.08 ± 2.19 3.63 2.5

CSA = mean ± SD averaged across all repetitions and all sites, avg. max. abs. Δscans = mean maximum observed difference (MMOD), bold: lowest CV and MMOD).

CSA, cross-sectional area; MMOD, mean maximum observed difference; CV, coefficient of variation; SCT, Spinal Cord Toolbox; NQL, NeuroQLab; ASM, Active Surface Method.