Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 4;12:715712. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.715712

TABLE 4.

Effect of dietary TB on ileal and cecal bacterial populations (log10 CFU/g fresh digesta) in broilers.

Item Bacteria Control TB1 TB2 TB3 TB4 Pooled SEM Treatment P-value Liner P-value Quadratic P-value
21 days
Ileal digesta Bacillus 4.76b 4.89b 5.28a 5.35a 5.43a 0.04 0.00 0.30 0.07
Lactobacillus 4.53c 5.19b 5.24b 5.62b 6.35a 0.08 0.00 0.06 0.05
Cecal digesta Bacillus 6.62b 6.71b 6.77b 7.33a 7.54a 0.05 0.00 0.44 0.34
Lactobacillus 6.87b 6.96ab 7.10ab 7.15ab 7.36a 0.02 0.00 0.61 0.06
Coliforms 7.49a 6.90b 6.61b 6.46b 6.47b 0.05 0.05 0.43 0.07
42 days
Ileal digesta Bacillus 3.95b 4.16ab 4.25ab 4.41ab 4.74a 0.03 0.04 0.19 0.19
Lactobacillus 4.03c 4.18bc 4.51ab 4.71ab 4.96a 0.04 0.00 0.10 0.02
Cecal digesta Bacillus 6.65 6.75 6.90 6.98 6.91 0.02 0.00 0.52 0.02
Lactobacillus 5.93b 6.15b 6.20ab 6.60a 6.63a 0.04 0.00 0.27 0.10
Coliforms 7.14a 7.00a 6.76ab 6.50b 6.32b 0.04 0.01 0.82 0.07

SEM, standard error of the mean; TB, tributyrin. Control = basal diet; TB1 = basal diet supplemented with 230 mg/kg TB; TB2 = basal diet supplemented with 460 mg/kg TB; TB3 = basal diet supplemented with 920 mg/kg TB; TB4 = basal diet supplemented with 1,840 mg/kg TB. a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05).