Table 2.
Data extraction criteria
| 1 | Tool’s name and the city and country in which it was developed and applied |
| 2 | Software/hardware characteristics—proprietary/license based or open-source; cost; online/cloud-based and/or offline, desktop, smartphone app, interactive table; others; distributed or face-to-face. |
| 3 | Functions and use—communication; spatial data visualisation; pre-built analysis modules; sketch planning and editing of spatial data layers; 3D visualisation; health impact analysis/modelling; individual or group decision making. |
| 4 | The user interface/information mediums—maps, graphs, charts, reports |
| 5 | The scale of the project/scenario being applied to: precinct/neighbourhood/city/metro/region/country |
| 6 | The target application/planning-related task or stage of a project cycle or decision process the PSS intended to support (site and context analysis, concept design, community consultation, design review, design documentation) |
| 7 | The intended users—who are the PSS intended for/target audience—planners/policymakers/community/elected members, others |
| 8 | The built environment/urban design exposure features have been used—e.g., density, land use mix, street connectivity, public open space, others |
| 9 | The health-supportive behaviour or outcomes impacts that have been used/estimated for the health impact scenario mode—e.g., walking, physical activity, mental health |
| 10 | The source of health data/evidence used |
| 11 | The scale at which the of health outcome data is collected/modelled—individual or geographic unit/s |
| 12 | The predictive/statistical modelling technique was used to estimate the health impacts |
| 13 | The population demographics the health impact is estimated for—children, young adults, adults, and older adults |