Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jul;89(7):601–614. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000663

Figure 5: Moderators of main effect of Stage 2 selective bridging strategy on change in binge drinking from baseline to follow-up 1 in heavy drinkers only (tertiary aim, N=158).

Figure 5:

Note: The ratio of ratios measures the difference between the coach group and the email group in change in binge drinking frequency from baseline to follow-up 1. If the ratio of ratios is 1, there is no difference between the groups. If the ratio of ratios is below 1, coach is better than email, i.e., the coach group had a smaller change in binge drinking frequency. If the ratio of ratios is above 1, email is better than coach. In this figure, a nonzero slope is evidence of effect modification by the proposed moderator. P-values are for the relevant interaction term.