Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 27;106(9):e3748–e3759. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab204

Table 2.

Association AMH with difference in menstrual cycle lengtha, long menstrual cycles, and short menstrual cycles

AMH (ng/mL) No. of cycles Adjustedb Δ in cycle length (days) (95% CI)e Adjustedc Δ in cycle length (days) (95% CI)e
Linear AMH, per 1 ng/mL increase 1880 0.30 (0.24, 0.36) 0.30 (0.24, 0.36)
<1.6 568 –1.00 (–1.48, –0.53) –0.98 (–1.46, –0.50)
1.6-3.4 606 Reference
>3.4-8 558 1.32 (0.86, 1.78) 1.35 (0.88, 1.82)
>8 148 2.08 (1.40, 2.77) 2.15 (1.46, 2.83)
Long cycles (>35 days) aOR (95% CI) b aOR (95% CI) c aOR (95% CI) d
<1.6 430 0.67 (0.39, 1.16) 0.64 (0.36, 1.14) 0.93 (0.46, 1.86)
1.6-3.4 534 Reference
>3.4-8 566 1.68 (1.10, 2.59) 1.69 (1.08, 2.65) 1.79 (1.06, 2.99)
>8 191 4.73 (2.86, 7.84) 4.92 (2.89, 8.36) 4.41 (2.41, 8.06)
Short cycles (<25 days) aOR (95% CI) b aOR (95% CI) c aOR (95% CI) d
<1.6 567 1.65 (1.19, 2.28) 1.61 (1.14, 2.26) 1.96 (1.32, 2.89)
1.6-3.4 596 Reference
>3.4-8 521 0.46 (0.30, 0.70) 0.44 (0.28, 0.68) 0.59 (0.36, 0.96)
>8 135 0.46 (0.23, 0.90) 0.42 (0.21, 0.85) 0.24 (0.11, 0.53)

a To achieve normality of the model residuals, the continuous analysis was limited to cycles between 22 and 36 days long.

b Adjusted for age.

c Adjusted for age, race, education, BMI, time since oral contraceptive use, alcohol, smoking, and caffeine consumption.

d Sensitivity analysis of the association of categorical AMH with long and short cycles weighted by the inverse of cycles contributed by each woman (fully adjusted).

e All comparison P values were <.001.