Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 27;106(9):e3748–e3759. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab204

Table 3.

Association FSH with difference in menstrual cycle lengtha, long menstrual cycles, and short menstrual cycles

FSH (mIU/mL) No. cycles Adjustedb Δ in cycle length days (95% CI) Adjustedc Δ in cycle length days (95% CI)
Linear FSH, per 1 mIU/mL increase 1773 –0.15 (–0.22, –0.08) –0.15 (–0.23, –0.08)
<10 1563 Reference
≥10 210 –1.04 (–1.70, –0.39) –1.10 (–1.76, –0.44)
Long cycles (>35 days) aOR (95% CI) b aOR (95% CI) c aOR (95% CI) d
<10 1435 Reference
≥10 158 0.31 (0.15, 0.65) 0.32 (0.15, 0.71) 0.24 (0.10, 0.60)
Short cycles (<25 days) aOR (95% CI) b aOR (95% CI) c aOR (95% CI) d
<10 1506 Reference
≥10 214 1.46 (0.97, 2.19) 1.52 (1.01, 2.30) 1.43 (0.88, 2.32)

Results are displayed as change in cycle length in days for a given FSH category, compared to the reference group.

a To achieve normality of the model residuals, the continuous analysis was limited to cycles between 22 and 36 days long.

b Adjusted for age.

c Adjusted for age, race, education, BMI, time since oral contraceptive use, alcohol, smoking, and caffeine consumption.

d Sensitivity analysis the association of categorical FSH with long and short cycles weighted by the inverse of cycles contributed by each woman.