Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Dev Psychol. 2021 May 25;75:101290. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101290

Table 3.

Percentages for Order of Selection of “Being Mexican” for the Ethnic-Racial Identity Centrality Measure.

Items Full Sample (N = 126) Separately by Mothers’ Nativitya Separately by Child Sexb
Indicated that being Mexican was the 1st most central out of 5 options 16% 15% / 17% 18% / 14%
Indicated that being Mexican was the 2nd most central out of 5 options 20% 24% / 18% 25% / 16%
Indicated that being Mexican was the 3rd most central out of 5 options 20% 12% / 24% 14% / 24%
Indicated that being Mexican was the 4th most central out of 5 options 21% 27% / 18% 16% / 24%
Indicated that being Mexican was the 5th most central out of 5 options 24% 22% / 25% 27% / 21%

Note.

a

Children with foreign-born mothers (n = 41) / U.S.-born mothers (n = 85)

b

Children who were girls (n = 50) / boys (n = 55). Percentages reported are valid percentages (i.e., only children who responded are included).